K-Vintners and Charles Smith libel lawsuit moves forward

Charles SmithIn a nod to the growing importance of wine bloggers, Charles Smith of K Vintners (I profiled him here) is suing anonymous commenters on a post published on Blake Gray’s Gray Market Report. To get the full power of the verbiage, read the original post on The Gray Market Report.

Charles has enjoyed the sunshine-y limelight on his wines (including praise from this professional writer) and Blake Gray didn’t particularly enjoy all of them. Some of them, yes, but not all. And Blake, as is his first amendment right to do, published his thoughts.

But Charles Smith and K Vintners accepted that in stride. It was the reactions to the post that sent them running to the courthouse. Statements like:

“Having been around Mr. Smith, he is not the winemaker; nor do his staff always listen to him. Your first impression was correct – “didn’t like him”. He is a promoter, not a winemaker.” And…

“As far as being verbally abusive to employees Charles told a female employee at Hospice du Rhone in front of maybe 200 people that ‘she could F*** up a blow job'” .

Yikes. Seeing these as slander (and there are many other scathing words), Charles Smith went to the courts and asked Google to reveal the origins of the anonymous comments. Read more details about the lawsuit here.

No one likes to see themselves smeared in print… anywhere. But what does this mean for “free speech’? Should a commenter be able to say whatever they want about someone, whether it’s true or not? What would you do if you were Charles Smith?



  1. I am not totally opposed to some legal recourse to certain types of blog comments. People have a right to their opinions. “Rosy Red is terrible wine”…absolute right to say. “The maker of Rosy Red is a stupid jerk”…also absolute. “The maker of Rosy Red, Phil Wino called an employee an unmentionable name in front of 200 people.” That is true or false. If that didn’t happen and it can be proved there should be recourse…we have no absolute right to LIE about other citizens.

  2. Public comment is a 2 way street, if we going to open that street, we have to be prepared for the traffic both ways. All in the public eye get trashed, even me as a health care provider to society. Seems to me his course of action was wrong and would warrant neutral parties to wonder about how true it represents his character. This guy needs a PR consultant. I suspect he thinks he knows who these people are. Either way, get some croc skin…and shut up and make the dam wine please..we are thirsty


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *